So, I ran a search for my name. Last I checked, I know how to spell my name, and i know I'm on my laps and: Zero hits.
I double checked by signing in, and yes, my results are there, and my name is ....my name. Spelled correctly. Wow.
So, I wrote a rather annoyed email. (Rather embarrassed about that now, LOL)
....your search is useless. I put in my name, for example. (Jake Gulick) I tried others...and it returned nothing. Zero results. Your company is acting like the monopoly that it is, and that stinks.
Expecting nothing in response, i got this today:
Dear Jake,
Thank you for your email. The search is different from before, but actually a lot better. It did not find all entries related to a search item and now it does.
If you could give me your phone number I would like to call you and show you that the search function is actually not that bad. After the initial search, you may get a lot of hits. You can then narrow your search by events, practice, racers and organizations.
Please have a look at the screenshots below. Maybe the difference lies in the fact that I searched only with your last name, we will look at this in more detail.
I don’t see how a high market share would allow us to provide less than great service or reduce our interest in our customers needs. That is certainly not the case at AMB. MyLaps is free and more than 90,000 members are enjoying this service. We are investing a great deal in this site and you will see improvements and enhancements in the future. For the same reason, your feedback is much appreciated and I will make sure our marketing department sees it as well.
Sincerely,
Bernd Pluimers
AMB i.t. US, Inc.
Wow. And it's obviously written by a human. He included a screen shot showing the results of a search for "Gulick"...and it worked.
So, I wnet to mylaps and entered my name in the cover pages search box. Nothing.
Hmmm, the results page includes options for "events" "racers", etc, so I clicked racer, and sure enough, it found me, and listed my "recent events". Onlt about 10 results, back to October of 08.
So, it seems to be functioning, but with caveats. I give them credit for responding, but they should hire google to write their algorithms!