zracre
New member
Oh looksie....heres one!!! http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAP...TRK%3AMEWA%3AIT
tempting...very tempting. Id go fuelie!! just for the tunability!
tempting...very tempting. Id go fuelie!! just for the tunability!
Do you have any info on what size the injectors are on this system?Keyrect Morey. Probably more than that (maybe 300 or 350 total) if you count the pre-production 1978 coupes that came over in 1978. They actually are not that hard to find, and sell for cheaper than the convertible. You can get a decent TR8 coupe for $4 or 5k if you look and take your time.
On the FI, the generally accepted wisdom amongst the crowd that races a lot of these cars (in the UK) is that the FI stinks. However, they are comparing it to 4 barrel Holley 390s or Weber 500s, not Zenith Strombergs.
I may pick up an FI system at some point to fiddle with. However, I think the intake is a problem and, as Joe indicated, so too are the injectors. Remember, this is a car that was designed with 135 stock hp. There was not much need for flow on the stock motor.
[/b]
280z is also a flapper style L-jet system....Nothing more than a potentiometer (sp?) Pluged into a Motec not an issue. I believe you could change the value but why? All it is telling the ECU is how much airflow (by door position) is coming into the engine. When I look at those carbs I see two big reasons to go EFI. I will admit that I would anytime it is allowed because without fuel in those intake runners there is room for more air. Mixing fuel behind the valve will provide a much cleaner way to control mixture all the way through the power curve.Joe, Ron, did some reading on the early FI used on the TR8.
The main problem with the stock system appears to be fuel delivery (which can be fixed) and the AFM (which cannot). The AFM is a "flapper" type that only measures air velocity. It does not measure air denisty or even temperature. Hard to tune it apparently.
Hmm...adding sensors allowed or not? Hadn't thought of that.
[/b]