Your right there is a bit of a difference. The walls seperating cyl2-3 and 4-5 on the e-88s have less of a taper from the carb side than the n-33's which are reatively blunt. I have not seen an n-36 to compare, but have heard they are either similar or identical to the n-33. We're gonna try each (e-88 and n-33) just to see how the different runners affeect it if at all. My sneaking suspicion is Katmans right that we are best off with the purtiest one.Being another 260, I have no choices. There were a lot of options for the 240. Look into the carb openning, at the middle port. I think that there is one, like the N-33 that you will see a difference in. I am told it is almost as good as the N-36. I have even seen a very fast 240 with a N-36 on it for a while. Seems the dude didn't know, must not have cuz as soon as I mentioned to him that they were a 260 only part, he came back with N-33's.
Mike
Say, that light blue #71 above isn't an ITS car, is it![]()
Not to mention he's rebuilding YOUR engine...He's pretty ingenious though, and fast, so I have no doubt that within a couple of years the only time we'll be that close on track is right before the green falls.
Is it just me or is the 240Z in ITS just pure heaven? Frig. Wish we had a supply of rust free stuff up here.

Mine's a 280. Soooooo closeIf I were building a new car now, and had a bigger budget, I'd be seriously thinking about a 280.
Mine's a 280. Soooooo close