Originally posted by Andy Bettencourt@Jan 8 2006, 03:06 PM
Even the answers to the original question show that people don't care. I think most people would rather talk behind someone back and say they got beat by a cheater than actually do the research, confront someone and then expose them.
It's a societal issue really. Most people in this world need to grow a pair. Stand up for what you believe in or keep your yapper shut.
AB
[snapback]70417[/snapback]
Andy: I like your thinking.

I agree that those with short shifters (in their car's shift linkage!) should be protested, preferably by someone a couple of places back or even in front of the offending cars. I intend to go to great lengths to make sure my car is 100% legal, even though I don't have a snowball's change in hell for a win (but that was my choice and one that I am confortable with).
That being said, I am not sure that allowing short shifters would be a bad thing. The linkage on my Dodge Charger is the slopiest thing ever designed and could use any help at all to make it better.
Second, I had an old VW bug, back in my flower power days (even drove it through Woodstock once or twice). And the only way I could get the shifter to work was with a short shifter.
Third, I once read an article on improving lap times. The theory present went like this. Aside from cornering, you achieve your fastest lap times by accelerating to terminal velocity for your car as quickly as possible. While you are shifting, your engine is disconnected from the transmission, therefore not accelerating. Let's say you up-shift 5 times a lap. If you install a short shifter and save .05 seconds per shift, then total you reach terminal velocity .25 seconds sooner per lap. To make that a little more meaningful, if you can travel 1000 with a higher average speed (ie 99mph vs 98mph) you would save almost 0.1 sec per lap.
I know, this is all just theory, but.....